Be excellent - answer questions

Tom "spot" Callaway tcallawa at redhat.com
Tue May 19 14:23:20 UTC 2009


On 05/19/2009 10:08 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Sorry, but I disagree. Remember, we already had ambassadors leaving the
> project after the CLA changed. I don't share their concerns (otherwise I
> had to resign, too), but I do see there are people not willing to sign
> the current CLA which means they cannot get a FAS account.

This is a separate issue, lets not dogpile everything together
unnecessarily. There are some legitimate issues with the current CLA
that I am constantly working on resolving, but this is perhaps the most
complicated legal matter currently on Fedora Legal's plate. Even with
that, your statement that a CLA signature is required to get a FAS
account is not accurate. It is necessary to sign the CLA to make a
contribution to Fedora, but not simply to get a FAS account.

~spot




More information about the fedora-advisory-board mailing list