Be excellent - answer questions

[Seth Vidal]

On Tue, 19 May 2009, Christoph Wickert wrote:

> Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2009, 10:23 -0400 schrieb Tom "spot" Callaway:
>> On 05/19/2009 10:08 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>>> Sorry, but I disagree. Remember, we already had ambassadors leaving the
>>> project after the CLA changed. I don't share their concerns (otherwise I
>>> had to resign, too), but I do see there are people not willing to sign
>>> the current CLA which means they cannot get a FAS account.
>>
>> This is a separate issue, lets not dogpile everything together
>> unnecessarily. There are some legitimate issues with the current CLA
>> that I am constantly working on resolving, but this is perhaps the most
>> complicated legal matter currently on Fedora Legal's plate. Even with
>> that, your statement that a CLA signature is required to get a FAS
>> account is not accurate. It is necessary to sign the CLA to make a
>> contribution to Fedora, but not simply to get a FAS account.
>
> Thanks Spot for this correction. I signed the CLA back in the days long
> before FAS, so I wasn't aware of this.
>

Hey, I signed the cla when we had to FAX SOMETHING IN, so don't feel bad 
about getting confused about when it changed. ;)

-sv