[Ambassadors] Active/Inactive Ambassadors

[Francesco Ugolini]

Communication is the only tool to understand if what we do is the better
way of we are using a bad way. If a programmer make a modify to the
source code and not report this, how the other people can understand
this? It seems stupid but reports are the only way we have to work
together, if no, people would do what they want without any rules, and,
at the end, the project won't have any sense.


Regards

Francesco Ugolini

Jeffrey Tadlock ha scritto:
> Francesco Ugolini wrote:
>> Active Ambassador is a person who report his work, it's not important to
>> do this trough M-L or irc, he can send a mail to FAmSCo or to another
>> ambassadors that will report your activity, but we need reports.
> 
> An active ambassador is someone that promotes Fedora - whether it be at
> work, to friends and family, to their local LUG or at Open Source events
> near them.  Reporting of those events is just icing on the cake.
> 
> Yes, communication is good and should certainly be encouraged.  But to
> declare people such as Tony and Casey and certainly many others inactive
> because they didn't report what they do on a regular basis is *very*
> short-sighted.  Why do we even want to risk alienating these people?
> 
> As someone else mentioned - having inactive ambassadors costs the
> project nothing.  Trying to weed out inactive (I still haven't been
> convinced we have a good way to determine activity yet) can cause much
> more harm than any good it can bring us.
> 
> Where does the rest of FAMSCO stand on this issue?
> 
> --Jeffrey
> 
> -- 
> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list
> 

-- 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FrancescoUgolini