[Ambassadors] Poll ?? No!!

[Rahul Sundaram]

Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Patrick W. Barnes wrote:
> 
>> Trivial, sure, but it's already hard enough to get people to pay 
>> attention to
>> the CLA.  It would be only a matter of time before someone would use 
>> content
>> without checking for a completed CLA.
> 
> The answer, in my opinion, is to remove the CLA requirement *completely* 
> if you're not submitting actual code.  There are simpler ways to enforce 
> "copyright cleanliness" for wiki-based content.  For instance:
> 
> "By editing this wiki page, you agree that the content you add is made 
> available under the Open Publication License (link), and that you have 
> the legal right to contribute such content."
> 
> The CLA is overkill for wiki contribution.

Greg, you are officially outdated now. Try editing the wiki now. The 
edit window already has a license notice in it.

Rahul