[Ambassadors] ubuntu & fedora
kwade at redhat.com
Fri Jul 17 14:18:26 UTC 2009
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 09:41:26PM +0800, Izhar Firdaus wrote:
> i believe he is asking for a way to answer that question ... its a
> very common question asked by users..
> i usually mention this to new people -> "technically, they are similar
> .. what available in ubuntu can be available in fedora and vice versa
> .. main difference is the goal, community, purpose, and some internal
> architectures " ..
> I wonder how other Fedora ambassadors answer that question ...
I answer almost exactly as you do. I say something such as:
"95% or more of the code is the same, although each distro chooses
how close to 'absolute new' their code is. For example, in Fedora
you might get a number of pieces of software that are newer than
those in another distro, and for other pieces they may be older or
different choices for default than other distros. A lot of the
visual difference you see is just how the desktop is polished.
The technical differences are mostly visible to systems
administrators and mainly haved to do with package management and
configuration files. All of these differences arise from community
values. If a distro has a value of, 'Be the best desktop possible
that Just Works,' then you are going to make technical, marketing,
and community choices that support that value. If your values are,
'Draw together the best of current 100% free software for our
community of participants to use to improve the state of the world,'
then you are going to make different choices.
I recommend you study the values of the Linux distributions, try out
their live versions, and pick the one that resonates the most with
your personal values. Then participate like mad."
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Fedora-ambassadors-list