License for Community Contributed Art?
Greg DeKoenigsberg
gdk at redhat.com
Mon Apr 3 23:44:57 UTC 2006
Propose an idea and let's get legal's stance on it. Propose a specific
license, and why you think it is or isn't good.
It's really better not to go to legal with open-ended questions. Figure
out the answer that *you* want to get, and we'll fight to make it happen.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Warren Togami wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Currently all Bluecurve theme art contained in Fedora is under the GPL.
> This however might not be the best license for art contributions to
> Fedora. Karsten Wade suggested maybe the OPL that we use for Fedora
> Documentation would be good for Fedora Art. Tango Project is using CC
> attribution share-alike license.
>
> Could you please talk to legal and figure out the best license for
> Fedora Art contributions?
>
> And do we want Bluecurve to remain under the GPL? Some art contributors
> were interested in submitting new icons in the Bluecurve theme, so we
> need to think about how we handle this as we grow the art community.
>
> Thanks,
> Warren Togami
> wtogami at redhat.com
>
More information about the Fedora-art-list
mailing list