New version of mock working (I think)

[seth vidal]

On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 15:55 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Good points about other uses.  I'll comment on how this particular issue
> effects these uses:
> 
> On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 15:55 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > 1. in brew
> 
> Brew likes this because brew is already an xml-rpc server.
> 
> > 2. standalone with just a person in front of a terminal 
> 
> I would think that mock would default to having the notification turned
> off, since it requires configuration anyway, so standalone users
> shouldn't be affected (hopefully).
> 

sounds perfect. I just wanted to mention it. I'm sure you understand. :)

-sv