New version of mock working (I think)

[Mike McLean]

Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 15:55 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> 
>>1. in brew
> 
> Brew likes this because brew is already an xml-rpc server.

Actually no. Brew's use of xmlrpc does not imply that this particular 
suggestion will be easy to integrate with Brew. We'd want to be pushing 
data back to the brew-builder process which does not run an xmlrpc server.

Note I'm not necessarily against the idea, but I am wary.

I'd almost rather handle this with a standard format state file (say 
xml) and file locking.