New version of mock working (I think)

[Greg DeKoenigsberg]

On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Clark Williams wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:12 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> >> I hate to throw water on the fire, but to me XML-RPC seems like a
> >> sledgehammer.  There's actually a ton of code in xmlrpclib.py and for
> >> this specific instance of pushing status information back to a
> >> controlling process, I think it's somewhat heavy-handed.
> >
> > And I'll just pick this point in the thread to say that I agree with
> > dcbw here....   KISS goes a long way.  And while we can say that it's
> > configurable and you enable it if you want or don't if not -- that's
> > then two code paths for status to have to keep working and ensure we
> > don't break as well as maintaining them for some time
> >
> 
> So where were you guys when I was playing Horatius at the bridge? :)

They were letting you win the argument yourself, to prove how gosh-darned 
smart you are, Clark.  ;-)

--g

-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------