New version of mock working (I think)

[Clark Williams]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Clark Williams wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Jeremy Katz wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:12 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>>>> I hate to throw water on the fire, but to me XML-RPC seems like a
>>>> sledgehammer.  There's actually a ton of code in xmlrpclib.py and for
>>>> this specific instance of pushing status information back to a
>>>> controlling process, I think it's somewhat heavy-handed.
>>> And I'll just pick this point in the thread to say that I agree with
>>> dcbw here....   KISS goes a long way.  And while we can say that it's
>>> configurable and you enable it if you want or don't if not -- that's
>>> then two code paths for status to have to keep working and ensure we
>>> don't break as well as maintaining them for some time
>>>
>> So where were you guys when I was playing Horatius at the bridge? :)
>
> They were letting you win the argument yourself, to prove how gosh-darned
> smart you are, Clark.  ;-)
>

Not smart enough to argue that we should wait for our build system
clients to weigh in. Sigh...

Dan/Jeremy/Mike/Andreas/et al

How are you going to use file locking? Do you just want mock to lock
the status file when we're changing state, or is there something else
I'm missing?

Clark

P.S. Who let the marketing dweeb on this channel? :)


Clark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEoU7VHyuj/+TTEp0RAkrtAKDhdyQHZxmW+8ilshXePqcgJNGigACgtqgn
fcPt8h7/oZ/Irw5Jv4mrNnI=
=HYDS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----