mock buildroot definitions

[seth vidal]

On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 08:09 -0800, Chris Weyl wrote:
> On 3/28/06, Tim Powers <timp at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, why can't mock just use the same format it has been
> > using?
> >
> > Why is it dependent on what's being used elsewhere?
> 
> I think the idea is that it's not so much mock as yum, and every time
> yum changes how it interacts with comps.xml that would force a change
> as to how mock interacts with it (and a corresponding update of it). 
> (right?)
> 
> I like the idea, if it makes things more stable for a plague
> implementation.  How would it be handled tho?  Different rpms for the
> different groups?  (e.g., buildsys-base, buildsys-minimal, etc, etc) 
> Or one big rpm?

I like the 3 different pkgs idea.

-sv