mock buildroot definitions

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 11:21 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > I like the idea, if it makes things more stable for a plague
> > implementation.  How would it be handled tho?  Different rpms for the
> > different groups?  (e.g., buildsys-base, buildsys-minimal, etc, etc) 
> > Or one big rpm?
> 
> I like the 3 different pkgs idea.

I like this too.  It would allow for easy customization, just adding
another package or so for different package groups.  I don't think this
is any heavier or harder than comps was, and since its just an rpm,
yum's interaction with it shouldn't change overtime.

+1

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-buildsys-list/attachments/20060328/ad4de978/attachment.sig>