Troubles running pungi
Gary Thomas
gary at mlbassoc.com
Tue Feb 5 19:58:38 UTC 2008
Gary Thomas wrote:
> I'm having trouble running pungi. What's really troubling is that this
> exact recipe (set of commands) worked fine last Friday :-( The only
> thing that took place in the meantime was a power failure (this build
> system was idle at the time).
>
> I'm using the distributed kickstart file with the repo lines changed to
> be:
> # Add the repos you wish to use to compose here. At least one of them
> needs group data.
> repo --name=testing --baseurl=file:/mnt/work/fedora/AM
>
> Any ideas?
>
> [root at mac_mini pungi_f8]# time pungi -c f8-fedora.ks --all-stages
> --nosource
> Pungi.Gather:INFO: Adding repo testing
> Pungi.Gather:INFO: URL for repo testing is ['file:/mnt/work/fedora/AM']
> Pungi.Gather:INFO: Getting sacks for arches ['ppc64', 'ppc', 'noarch',
> 'src']
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/pungi", line 178, in <module>
> main()
> File "/usr/bin/pungi", line 66, in main
> mygather.getPackageObjects()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pypungi/gather.py", line 245,
> in getPackageObjects
> searchlist.extend(self.getPackagesFromGroup(group))
> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pypungi/gather.py", line 191,
> in getPackagesFromGroup
> if not self.ayum.comps.has_group(group.name):
> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 542, in
> <lambda>
> comps = property(fget=lambda self: self._getGroups(),
> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 505, in
> _getGroups
> groupfile = repo.getGroups()
> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 884, in
> getGroups
> file = self.retrieveMD('group')
> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 855, in
> retrieveMD
> cache=self.http_caching == 'all')
> File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 623, in
> _getFile
> raise Errors.NoMoreMirrorsRepoError, errstr
> yum.Errors.NoMoreMirrorsRepoError: failure: repodata/Fedora-8-comps.xml
> from testing: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
>
> real 0m4.100s
> user 0m3.689s
> sys 0m0.388s
>
> [root at mac_mini pungi_f8]# sestatus
> SELinux status: disabled
>
> [root at mac_mini pungi_f8]# ls -l
> /mnt/work/fedora/AM/repodata/Fedora-8-comps.xml
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1206345 2008-02-01 09:02
> /mnt/work/fedora/AM/repodata/Fedora-8-comps.xml
>
> [root at mac_mini pungi_f8]# rpm -qi pungi
> Name : pungi Relocations: (not relocatable)
> Version : 1.1.9 Vendor: Fedora Project
> Release : 1.fc8 Build Date: Mon 29 Oct 2007
> 03:51:26 PM MDT
> Install Date: Fri 30 Nov 2007 05:40:33 AM MST Build Host:
> ppc3.fedora.redhat.com
> Group : Development/Tools Source RPM:
> pungi-1.1.9-1.fc8.src.rpm
> Size : 131116 License: GPLv2
> Signature : DSA/SHA1, Mon 29 Oct 2007 08:20:47 PM MDT, Key ID
> b44269d04f2a6fd2
> Packager : Fedora Project
> URL : http://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/pungi
> Summary : Distribution compose tool
> Description :
> A tool to create anaconda based installation trees/isos of a set of rpms.
>
I've figured out what happened. I *did* change something else which
I forgot about. I edited the comps file for the repository to not
include selinux-policy in @base. That's all.
I just verified this by starting with the comps file from the original
F8 repository. pungi worked as planned. Then I edited the comps file:
[root at mac_mini pungi_test]# diff -u
/work3/FC/fedora/releases/8/Everything/ppc/os/repodata/Fedora-8-comps.xml ../AM/repodata/
--- /work3/FC/fedora/releases/8/Everything/ppc/os/repodata/Fedora-8-comps.xml 2007-11-02
08:11:44.000000000 -0600
+++ ../AM/repodata/Fedora-8-comps.xml 2008-02-05 12:51:37.000000000 -0700
@@ -2217,7 +2217,6 @@
<packagereq type="mandatory">rootfiles</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">rpm</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">rsyslog</packagereq>
- <packagereq type="mandatory">selinux-policy-targeted</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">setserial</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">setup</packagereq>
<packagereq type="mandatory">shadow-utils</packagereq>
This produced the crash/failure as documented above. Why? If this isn't
to be allowed, at least a reasonable message instead of a traceback would
be preferable.
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Fedora-buildsys-list
mailing list