[fedora-java] Fedora Extras submission - classpath-0.92

Paul paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk
Tue Sep 19 22:31:25 UTC 2006


Hi,

> > Am I widdling into the wind by submitting this or is libgcj just that
> > bit too far from classpath-0.92?
> 
> libgcj will not work if what you want is a runtime for IKVM or similar.

That's what I thought when I was speaking with the ikvm guys

> That being said, I'm not sure it makes sense to build and install GNU
> Classpath independently from another JVM project.  I think we want JRE
> projects and related technology to get installed using the JPackage
> alternatives system.  Can you describe your GNU Classpath use-cases a
> little more?  For instance... you're building Limewire with what?  And
> to run on what JRE?

I'm building limewire against classpath. It should run on the same JVM
that OOo runs on (gcj IIRC).

ikvm needs classpath to build happily

As it stands, ikvm is my top priority as it's currently breaking the FE
packaging rules of being a binary only package (it was accepted in like
this). Limewire would be nice, but it's a big package and I doubt will
be that simple to build.

TTFN

Paul
-- 
"Der einzige Weg, Leute zu kontrollieren ist sie anzulügen" - L. Ron
"Ich kann kein Science-Fiction schreiben" Hubbard; Lügner, Betrüger,
Fixer und Wohltäter zu niemandem
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/attachments/20060919/edf84021/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-java-list mailing list