[fedora-java] gnuxml -> xerces/xalan?

[Andrew Overholt]

* Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> [2007-02-06 11:17]:
> Andrew Overholt writes:
>  > * Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp.org> [2007-02-06 04:15]:
>  > > more standards compliant (although I guess that doesn't help if your
>  > > application isn't using xml in a compliant way).
>  > 
>  > Yeah, I also find it very hard to track down bugs that are deep within
>  > Eclipse or in wacky ant scripts + custom ant tasks.  Also, the lack of
>  > debugging still sucks (yes, I know it's being worked on).
> 
> Hey, I've been using the FC6 spin of gdb on Java code and it's great.

gdb isn't really a great solution for Eclipse plugins.  It's doable,
yes, but a PITA.

> Optimized code is a pain to debug, but non-optimized code works a
> treat.  There are still a few features I'd like to add, of course.

Are our RPMs non-optimized?

Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/attachments/20070206/9bd9442b/attachment.sig>