[fedora-java] The default java alternative?

[Jerry James]

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
> Packages should generally be buildable on both.  If they're not, they
> can be marked, e.g. as dependent on openjdk.

I've had to do this for a couple of my packages that build fine with
gcj, but whose documentation is not produced in an acceptable manner
by sinjdoc.  It doesn't handle javadocs for annotation definitions,
for one thing.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/