[fedora-java] The default java alternative?

[Andrew Haley]

Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Packages should generally be buildable on both.  If they're not, they
>> can be marked, e.g. as dependent on openjdk.
> 
> I've had to do this for a couple of my packages that build fine with
> gcj, but whose documentation is not produced in an acceptable manner
> by sinjdoc.  It doesn't handle javadocs for annotation definitions,
> for one thing.

Yes, sinjdoc is rather old.  If it doesn't do the job, then you'll have
to mark your package as dependent on openjdk.

Andrew.