Adding FOP Support to xmlto to fix PDF generation (Bug 147472)
Jeffrey C. Ollie
jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us
Tue Feb 8 20:12:28 UTC 2005
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:58 -0700, Trever L. Adams wrote:
>
> If I had money to throw at it, I think I would encourage another to be
> written (maybe in C/C++).
Take a look at xmlroff:
http://xmlroff.sourceforge.net/
> Also, I just saw that [FOP] hasn't changed since 2003 yesterday
I haven't read the FOP developer lists for a while, but they were/are
involved in a major rewrite because of architectural problems with the
code that had previously been release. I don't know what the current
status is though... Check the FOP developer list archives.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20050208/224a34ca/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list