Package pruning for FC4 and beyond
Neal Becker
ndbecker2 at verizon.net
Mon Feb 28 03:08:48 UTC 2005
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 08:38:51AM -0500, Eric Warnke wrote:
>> ElectricFence - Development only nothing depends on it - 1 objection,
>> but I still say it's usage does not justify it remaining in core - there
>> is at least one competing package ( dmalloc, valgrind )
>
> valgrind is i386 only (therefore not a replacement for efence) and
> dmalloc is far worse then efence. If anything needs to be dumped to
> Extras, then it is dmalloc, not ElectricFence.
Yes yes yes and yes.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list