question about RedHat/Fedora and the GPL

[Jesse Keating]

On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 18:41 +1200, condition terminal wrote:
> 
> So ignore a potentional violation because someone else is planning to
> do the same thing, but better?
> 
> Thats an interesting view point on possible GPL violations. 

No, ignore this thread as most people (and lawyers that have looked into
it) find no violation.  And further more, even if there WAS a violation,
most people on this list have 0 interest in seeing code to something
that is outdated, useless and is going away.  Instead they would like to
spend time working on an ALREADY OPEN build system that is tagged to be
the replacement.

What is it you hope to gain by accessing beehive?  Or is it merely that
you want to soapbox about Red Hat being evil and possibly (very very
very very unlikely) violating the GPL?

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating