suspend/hibernate on desktops

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 12:13 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> In practice, either the bugs will go unfixed, lowering the overall
> reputation of Fedora, or they'll land in bugzilla against 'kernel'
> where they'll also go unfixed, with the added bonus of driving me crazy
> as I try to make sense of problems that make no sense against a Fedora kernel.
> 
> We can add all the disclaimers and policies we want, users won't care
> (because typically, they don't read them, they read some HOWTO
>  that tells them to 'yum install kernel-suspend2' or the like).
> 
> They downloaded something from Fedora, they want Fedora to fix it when it breaks.
> If we're not setup to do that, we shouldn't do it.
> 

I am in deep agreement here.  I don't see these kernels in extras as
being anything other than a bad thing.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20060116/ce86d159/attachment.sig>