Can we make readahead more robust to package updates?

[Peter Gordon]

On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 13:57 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> Can we update readahead's implementation so we can get per package
> control of the default configs?  Is a readahead.d/ structure
> appropriate here?

I think this would be the Right Way(tm) to do it. Without native support
for it, we could still at least cat all of those files into the proper
readahead listing before running it.
-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20061112/ee74697e/attachment.sig>