Fedora 7
Dan Williams
dcbw at redhat.com
Fri Jan 5 16:27:33 UTC 2007
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 17:09 +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 15:54 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:28:48AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>>
> >>> http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManagerConfiguration
> >>
> >> Hmmm, looks like this kind of definition is going to have a hard time
> >> working in real setups. Lemme give you some examples of what I use on
> >> a regular basis:
> >
> > Which is why it's good to have feedback :) So at least the 'gateway'
> > item needs to be re-thought, since that's route-based and not
> > interface/connection specific underneath. Though to many users it
> > appears so, because they do not have complex setups, the flexibility
> > needs to be there underneath.
> >
>
> It is at least important to be able to add multiple addresses to one
> (physical) interface.
Yep! That's obviously required.
> I personally don't like the old eth0:0 eth0:1 (...), but prefer the new
That format is vile.
> iproute2 style, but I guess I can live with aliases as long as it is
> easy to add/remove them.
Dan
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list