XULRunner - will be or won't be?

[Christopher Aillon]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Christopher Aillon wrote:
> 
>> That makes no sense.  Are you seriously telling me that you ratify 
>> changes that may be sub-par with the intent that they can be changed? 
> 
> No but policies can be ratified with the understanding that they are not 
> written in stone.
> 
>> Sounds like you need to revise your ratification process (or lack 
>> thereof) before people should feel comfortable following anything that 
>> gets "voted" on.
> 
> That's a FESCo decision that I am not involved with.

I wonder if I'm the only person that got the impression you were 
invovled with it based on your comments.  Don't try to strongarm people 
into following _draft_ policies based on the fact that you personally 
_expect_ it to be ratified.