Proposal ocaml guidelines
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Fri May 4 12:50:41 UTC 2007
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I also wonder if we want to specify that ocaml programs should be
> compiled to native code.
David Allsopp reminded me (in a private email) that byte code and native
code programs also differ in functionality. For example, Dynlink is not
available to native code - which is the reason why mod_caml is always
compiled to bytecode, even though in theory it could be compiled to
native code on platforms which support that.
Rich.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
64 Baker Street, London, W1U 7DF Mobile: +44 7866 314 421
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom.
Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David
Owens (Ireland)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3237 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070504/91c480d5/attachment.bin>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list