For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

Jarod Wilson jwilson at
Wed May 30 13:58:11 UTC 2007

Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 May 2007 09:44:15 Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> I'm all for working with whomever to get secondary arches working, but I
>> am generally building packages for security issues, and I'd strongly
>> prefer to not do re-spins because of failures on arches we don't
>> officially support.  It's hard enough getting them out on arches we do.
> And before somebody barks about it, I don't want to see us 'officially 
> supporting' an arch that has a tiny fraction of the user base.  *cough* ppc

Quit hating on my powerbook. At least until I get something x86_64 to 
replace it...

Jarod Wilson
jwilson at

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list