For your consideration: Secondary Architectures in Fedora

Brian Pepple bpepple at
Wed May 30 14:05:47 UTC 2007

On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 09:49 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 May 2007 09:44:15 Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > I'm all for working with whomever to get secondary arches working, but I
> > am generally building packages for security issues, and I'd strongly
> > prefer to not do re-spins because of failures on arches we don't
> > officially support.  It's hard enough getting them out on arches we do.
> And before somebody barks about it, I don't want to see us 'officially 
> supporting' an arch that has a tiny fraction of the user base.  *cough* ppc


Brian Pepple <bpepple at>

gpg --keyserver --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list