why does yum want xulrunner?

[Rahul Sundaram]

Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:37:23 +0530
> Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> 
>> Not sure which one you are referring to. I understand X wants Y to 
>> specific a direct or indirect dependency which is not the case here.
>> Yum is merely indicating a repository issue in this instance.
> 
> Ok, shame on me for giving you the benefit of the doubt.  Yum update
> transactions /will/ in fact bring xulrunner into the transaction set.
> You could verify this yourself if you tried.  Apologies to Michael.

You were correct. I was referring to direct/indirect dependencies to yum 
itself and not update transactions.

Rahul