[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: CLA is broken (was: Re: packages without internet source in fedora)



On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 17:49 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> But the contributor is supposed to sign it, supposedly without
> getting a legal advice.

Where do we state, suggest, encourage, hint that you should sign it
without getting legal advice?  Seriously?


-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]