[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rawhide report: bacula/kannel -> mktexlsr ?
- From: Caolan McNamara <caolanm redhat com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: rawhide report: bacula/kannel -> mktexlsr ?
- Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:56:08 +0000
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 07:24 -0500, Build System wrote:
> Broken deps for i386
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> bacula-* - 2.0.3-11.fc8.i386 requires libssl.so.6
> kannel - 1.4.1-5.i386 requires libssl.so.6
So, what exactly is the current problem with these two ? Is it just the
mysterious failure of TeX to execute some stuff, i.e.
"
latex -interaction=batchmode bacula.tex
This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (Web2C 7.5.6)
%&-line parsing enabled.
entering extended mode
make[1]: *** [tex] Error 1
"
and...
"
cd `dirname doc/alligata/alligata.xml` && jadetex `basename doc/alligata/alligata`.tex >/dev/null || \
( echo Check `dirname doc/alligata/alligata.xml`/`basename doc/alligata/alligata`.log for errors && false)
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt jadetex.fmt
Check doc/alligata/alligata.log for errors
make: *** [doc/alligata/alligata.ps] Error 1
"
If so then I see (from a quick google) that locally running "mktexlsr"
before trying to build them was sufficient to give me two successful
builds. I can't add that to the affected .specs themselves so I suspect
that some TeX package in the dependency chain should effectively run
mktexlsr as root during install. Or something of that nature, I'm
vague on the TeX world.
C.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]