Orphaned packages not! (splat, gpsman, nec2c)

[Till Maas]

On Fri June 6 2008, Steve Grubb wrote:

> This is not a typical non-responsive maintainer problem. His email account
> listed on the package db entry is closed for a fact. So, why follow a
> proceedure that will take a few weeks when I know for a fact that I need to
> reassign some packages?  :)

Did he also loose his FAS account? If not, then he could have updated his 
email address in FAS.

Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080606/6ab542f5/attachment.sig>