default partition scheme without /home - why ?

[Valent Turkovic]

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>  > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:31:25AM -0500, Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
>  >> I can think of a good reason for a separate /home:  upgrade paths.  I know we
>  >> are getting better at it, but it can still be problematic if one tries to
>  >> install over a previous installation, and it is usually pretty smooth to just
>  >> format / while leaving /home intact.
>  >
>  > +1
>
>  But that means you need to guess relative sizes for / and /home or offer
>  some understandable choices.

That is obvious. And better to offer few choices than only one if possible.

Valent.

-- 
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/
linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless
registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org.
ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic