[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: review request for libpst



Michael Schwendt wrote, at 04/09/2009 05:34 PM +9:00:
Just a look at the spec:

On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:30:25 -0700, Carl wrote:

<http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst/packages/libpst.spec> and
<http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst/packages/libpst-0.6.35-1.src.rpm>.

Requires:           %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}

In the main utilities package, is this explicit dependency on the
library package really needed?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires

I have not checked this spec file in detail. however:
When I review packages I always request submitters to write
exact EVR specific dependency between packages rebuilt from the
same srpm and I think this is general for Fedora packages.
ref:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#RequiringBasePackage

Regards,
Mamoru


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]