Proposed F13 feature: drop separate updates repository

Mike McGrath mmcgrath at
Thu Dec 3 03:32:03 UTC 2009

On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Bruno Wolff III wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 17:58:24 -0500,
>   Seth Vidal <skvidal at> wrote:
> >
> > I tested it on our backend to be sure. getting the complete pkglist
> > goes from taking 5 minutes to take 30s.
> >
> > yes, I said 5 minutes.
> Have you tried any of the tunning knobs to have the directory cache be
> alotted more space or given higher priority? For example:
> vfs_cache_pressure
> ------------------
> Controls the tendency of the kernel to reclaim the memory which is used for
> caching of directory and inode objects.
> At the default value of vfs_cache_pressure=100 the kernel will attempt to
> reclaim dentries and inodes at a "fair" rate with respect to pagecache and
> swapcache reclaim.  Decreasing vfs_cache_pressure causes the kernel to prefer
> to retain dentry and inode caches.  Increasing vfs_cache_pressure beyond 100
> causes the kernel to prefer to reclaim dentries and inodes.

We have experimented with this for the purposes of rsync on our mirrors
but haven't experimented for this specific issue.


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list