Default ISA/tuning flags for GCC, --enable-kernel= level for glibc
Matthew Woehlke
mw_triad at users.sourceforge.net
Mon Jan 26 22:54:08 UTC 2009
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
Can you please not quote full e-mail headers? Aside from feeding
spammers, it's a waste of bandwidth.
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Can we *please* wait a bit until raising the bar *that* high? Breaking
>> mock builds for rawhide on F9/10 releases is a really bad idea IMHO.
>> Which meas supporting at least 2.6.27. Maybe in a year when F9 is EOL
>> and F10 has a 2.6.29 kernel update we can reconsider 2.6.29.
>
> So when 2010 rolls around you'll be saying "pleaseeeee wait until F12
> has reached EOL"?
If at that point you're calling for 2.6.34 or whatever is current then,
then of course you'll get the same complaining.
I fail to see how supporting live upgrade from an in-support version is
unreasonable.
> The pain has to occur sometime.
Why? Drop support for not-supported kernels. Currently that seems to
mean 'earlier than 2.6.18'. In the future, that will be something
higher, and we can bump accordingly. There is a lag built into this
system, but that's much different than stagnation.
> How about rolling up to 2.6.18 right now? That shouldn't hurt anything,
> should it?
Unless I missed something, Gerd didn't say anything to indicate a
problem with that. I see rather 2.6.27 was mentioned, which is later
even than 2.6.18 (although I'd have to agree with Jesse about supporting
2.6.18).
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
find / -user your -name base -print0 | xargs -0 chown us:cats -- Unknown
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list