Deltarpm *not* ready for new RPM checksums (was Re: Ready for new RPM version?)

Seth Vidal skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Tue Mar 10 17:57:21 UTC 2009



On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Jonathan Dieter wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 19:41 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>> Ok, I've been trying this, but how can we tell if the sequence is sha256
>> or md5 if we're *just* given the sequence (i.e. applydeltarpm -c -s
>> audit-libs-1.7.12-1.fc11-04548395de7d18795d88b32ea98897e90140 where it's
>> a sha256 sequence)?
>
> Ok, I've got it.  We just check against md5 first, then sha256 if md5
> doesn't match.  It's not elegant, but it should work fine, especially
> since we're only checking for verification, *not* security.
>

why not just check the length of the checksum? md5 checksums are always 
going to be SHORTER than sha256.

Seems like a length check is lighter-weight.

-sv




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list