[Fedora-directory-devel] Starting Fedora DS without shell scripts?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 15:16 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On a Linux system, would it be possible to build Fedora DS without
> setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH?

As a followup, it seems to me that we don't need it (I was about to
start patching makefiles):

        linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xb7fc7000)
        libslapd.so.0
=> /scratch/fedora-ds/prefix/lib/fedora-ds/libslapd.so.0 (0xb7f14000)
        libssldap60.so => /usr/lib/libssldap60.so (0xb7ef3000)
        libprldap60.so => /usr/lib/libprldap60.so (0xb7eed000)

And my ns-slapd binary starts perfectly well without any LD_LIBRARY_PATH
foo.

> I thought I saw this being discussed at some point, and I wondered if I
> could suggest it again.  It could remove some of the shell-script
> wrapper stuff, which kind of looks funny...
> 
> BTW, how is this packaged?  I think the '-bin' versions of the commands
> should be in libexec, if they are not to be directly executed... 

Unless I'm missing something drastic, we shouldn't need these scripts at
all.  None of the binaries I had showed any undefined libraries...

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-devel/attachments/20070302/8de38dd6/attachment.sig>