[Fedora-directory-users] Available Revisions

[Rich Megginson]

Chen Shaopeng wrote:

>Rich Megginson wrote:
>  
>
>>Scott Boggs wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I have just started using the Fedora-DS.  I have to say that I am very
>>>impressed.  I currently am turning my attention towards working with
>>>the server on a SE Linux platform.  However, I was wondering if it is
>>>best to keep with the current static version that is provided via the
>>>source download site, or could I get the latest and greatest to see
>>>how in integrates.
>>>      
>>>
>>We will be releasing a new binary version very soon.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Could you tell what will be in the new build? and a date?
>  
>
We will be making an official announcement within the week, but the new 
build will have MD5, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512 password support.  It 
will also contain lots of bug fixes, many of which are in the windows 
sync component.

>It would be cool if the build process could be cleanly separated.
>For example, it should be easy to build the directory server
>alone, and build the admin and console alone.
>  
>
The build right now builds the directory server alone, and you can build 
the console alone as well.  See the 
http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/Building for more information.

>That would be easier for other people to participate too.
>It's not too scary that way, coz the whole thing is pretty
>big.
>
>rgds
>
>csp
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3312 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/attachments/20051026/b012738d/attachment.bin>