[Fedora-directory-users] New filesystem layout for directory server and admin server files

[Jim Summers]

I second the motion here.  Having the directory server contained in one 
directory makes things much more straightforward and easy to verify.  Which is 
a great help for such a critical service as the directory server provides.

Thanks

Bliss, Aaron wrote:
> We are currently using fds in production without any issues at all; at
> first, management was a little skeptical about using software so
> critical to production systems without the comfort of a support
> contract, but after working out the pre-implementation bugs, the
> reliability of the application speaks for itself; I can honestly say
> that having all files in /opt/fedora-ds makes doing full backups,
> restores and disaster recovery testing very straight forward; I simply
> shutdown slapd and the admin server, tar up the directory, and startup
> slapd and the admin server; very quick to do, no muss or fuss; taking
> fds out of it's own directory would make my life much more difficult (as
> far as backups, and dr testing are concerned); so from my point of view,
> if I had a vote, I would say that if it's not broke, then don't fix it
> :)
> 
> Aaron 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of
> mj at sci.fi
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 5:04 PM
> To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.;
> miranda at syndetic.org
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] New filesystem layout for
> directory server and admin server files
> 
> Michael Chang <miranda at syndetic.org> kirjoitti: 
>>
>> You could always make a separate, FHS-specific package available and
> see
>> what people think.  If the votes are high enough in support of the new
>> layout then you could make a permanent switch.
> 
> The problem here is assuming that FDS updates will eventually be pushed
> into RHDS.
> 
> Judging by a good portion of the traffic on this list, a good majority
> of the FDS users are still learning how to use an LDAP server, so they
> likely don't understand or care enough to have an opinion about file
> layout or why it matters in a package as large and complex as this one.
> 
> OTOH, the RHDS package is used for critical infrastructure in banks,
> military, telecoms, etc. By the time those users notice the change and
> it's ramifications, it will be too late for them to have their vote
> (other than with their feet).
> 
> --
> mike
> 
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
> 
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Notice:
> The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.
> 
> 
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

-- 
Jim Summers
School of Computer Science-University of Oklahoma
-------------------------------------------------