[389-users] SubjectAltName MMR question

[Rich Megginson]

Prashanth Sundaram wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Which one of the case below is suitable for a Multi-Master 
> replication. I have a load balancer with/ ldap.domain.com,/ which is 
> what clients will use to authenticate.
>
> *_Question:
> _*Which one is a better implementation? What are the trade-offs? 
> Please input your feedback as it might be useful for someone coming 
> this way later. This can serve as a knowledge bank.
>
> Case-I
> ldap01: server-cert with cn=ldap01.domain.com, subjAltName=ldap.domain.com
> ldap02: server-cert with cn=ldap02.domain.com, subjAltName=ldap.domain.com
> -MMR with tls throws error when “*Check hostname against name in 
> certificate for outbound SSL connections”* option is enabled. But RH 
> recommends it to be turned ON.
What is the FQDN you specified in the replication agreement?
>
> Case-II
> ldap01: server-cert with cn=ldap.domain.com, 
> subjAltName=ldap01.domain.com, ldap02.domain.com
> ldap01: server-cert with cn=ldap.domain.com, 
> subjAltName=ldap01.domain.com,ldap02.domain.com
> -Does not comply with the requirement that “server-cert” should have 
> hostname as cn.I found this method working perfectly fine.
>
> *Knowledge Sharing:
> *Here’s a useful link which I use all the time and look before posting 
> to the list. This is the archive for the mailing list and has /search/ 
> feature which very useful.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-directory-users@redhat.com/info.html
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>