release-notes/FC4 hardware-reqs.xml,1.6,1.7

[Karsten Wade (kwade)]

Author: kwade

Update of /cvs/docs/release-notes/FC4
In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12205

Modified Files:
	hardware-reqs.xml 
Log Message:
Fixes bz#159173, from some darn XSL bug I suspect that concatenates the <para>s together that are contained in a <listitem>.


Index: hardware-reqs.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/docs/release-notes/FC4/hardware-reqs.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- hardware-reqs.xml	31 May 2005 20:26:29 -0000	1.6
+++ hardware-reqs.xml	31 May 2005 23:25:52 -0000	1.7
@@ -32,22 +32,18 @@
     <itemizedlist arch="x86">
       <listitem>
 	<para><!-- <remark os="test">(x86)</remark> --> Minimum:
-	  Pentium-class</para>
-
-          <!-- <remark os="test">%%% <ulink
-              url="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136254">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136254</ulink>
-              %%%</remark> -->
-
-	<para>
-	  <!-- <remark os="test">(x86)</remark> --> &DISTRO; &DISTROVER;
-	  is optimized for Pentium 4 CPUs, but also supports earlier
-	  CPUs (such as Pentium, Pentium Pro, Pentium II, Pentium III,
-	  and including AMD and VIA variants).  This approach has been
-	  taken because Pentium-class optimizations actually result in
-	  reduced performance for non-Pentium-class processors, and
-	  Pentium 4 scheduling is sufficiently different (while making
-	  up the bulk of today's processors) to warrant this
-	  change.</para>
+	  Pentium-class — &FC; &LOCALVER; is optimized for Pentium
+	  4 CPUs, but also supports earlier CPUs (such as Pentium,
+	  Pentium Pro, Pentium II, Pentium III, and including AMD and
+	  VIA variants).  This approach has been taken because
+	  Pentium-class optimizations actually result in reduced
+	  performance for non-Pentium-class processors, and Pentium 4
+	  scheduling is sufficiently different (while making up the bulk
+	  of today's processors) to warrant this change. <!-- <remark
+	  os="test">%%% <ulink
+	  url="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136254">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136254</ulink> 
+	  %%%</remark> -->
+	</para>
       </listitem>
 
       <listitem>