draft notice text

Tammy Fox tfox at redhat.com
Fri Sep 17 19:21:15 UTC 2004


On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 13:51, Dave Pawson wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 16:32, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> 
> > If we can turn the footnote function back on for Fedora, that would be
> > great IMHO.
> 
> Is this project obligued to keep in step with rhel?
> 
> I see it drifting further and further from docbook.
>   Clinging to sgml is plain daft IMHO.
> 
> When docbook 5 comes out will it remain with the SGML DTD?
> What's the objection to keeping up to date?
>   
> 
> -- 
> Regards DaveP.
> XSLT&Docbook  FAQ
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl
> 
> 

No. We are not obligated to keep in step with RHEL. We are using a
different toolchain and can agree to upgrade to DocBook 5 when it comes
out if we want to. When a question comes up, I have been mentioning how
we solved the problem internally with our DocBook SGML toolchain to
offer a solution. Sometimes we agree to do the same thing. Sometimes we
agree to do something different.

Tammy





More information about the fedora-docs-list mailing list