Proposal for document entities
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Sat Nov 19 15:29:17 UTC 2005
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 11:10 +0000, Stuart Ellis wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 15:34 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > I would like to see this instead as a standard:
> >
> > <!ENTITY BOOKNAME "foo-tutorial">
> > <!ENTITY BOOKVERSION "0.15"> <!-- change version number here -->
> > <!ENTITY BOOKDATE "2005-01-01"> <!-- change revision date here -->
> > <!ENTITY BOOKID "&BOOKNAME;-&BOOKVERSION; (&BOOKDATE;)">
> > <!ENTITY BUG-NUM "000000"> <!-- only used while in draft -->
>
> Another +1.
>
> I'd prefer "DOC*", over "BOOK*" for these, just because documents may
> all not be Guides, and most of the end-products are on-line, rather than
> specifically for printing.
Excellent point.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20051119/b304c4ba/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list