Proposal for document entities
Karsten Wade
kwade at redhat.com
Mon Nov 21 05:38:34 UTC 2005
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 10:29 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 11:10 +0000, Stuart Ellis wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 15:34 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > I would like to see this instead as a standard:
> > >
> > > <!ENTITY BOOKNAME "foo-tutorial">
> > > <!ENTITY BOOKVERSION "0.15"> <!-- change version number here -->
> > > <!ENTITY BOOKDATE "2005-01-01"> <!-- change revision date here -->
> > > <!ENTITY BOOKID "&BOOKNAME;-&BOOKVERSION; (&BOOKDATE;)">
> > > <!ENTITY BUG-NUM "000000"> <!-- only used while in draft -->
> >
> > Another +1.
> >
> > I'd prefer "DOC*", over "BOOK*" for these, just because documents may
> > all not be Guides, and most of the end-products are on-line, rather than
> > specifically for printing.
>
> Excellent point.
+1
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Content Services Fedora Documentation Project
http://www.redhat.com/docs http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20051120/d05a74ea/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list