good <ulink> practice

Tommy Reynolds Tommy.Reynolds at MegaCoder.com
Sat Sep 17 14:07:13 UTC 2005


Uttered Mark Johnson <mjohnson at redhat.com>, spake thus:

> Karsten Wade wrote:
> Here's Stuart's yum tutorial I built with FOP a few weeks ago:
> http://people.redhat.com/mjohnson/fedora/yum-software-management-en.pdf
> It has some urls, but I don't recall how the ulinks in the source were 
> marked up...

I have tested both <ulink> forms using HTML and FOP.  Both forms
render correctly.  So the choice is ours.

I'd recommend using the null content form of

	<ulink url="http://www.example.com"/>

because it is more prone to correct usage.

Cheers
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050917/368aec82/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-docs-list mailing list