good <ulink> practice
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Sun Sep 18 23:50:07 UTC 2005
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 09:07 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered Mark Johnson <mjohnson at redhat.com>, spake thus:
>
> > Karsten Wade wrote:
> > Here's Stuart's yum tutorial I built with FOP a few weeks ago:
> > http://people.redhat.com/mjohnson/fedora/yum-software-management-en.pdf
> > It has some urls, but I don't recall how the ulinks in the source were
> > marked up...
>
> I have tested both <ulink> forms using HTML and FOP. Both forms
> render correctly. So the choice is ours.
>
> I'd recommend using the null content form of
>
> <ulink url="http://www.example.com"/>
>
> because it is more prone to correct usage.
I'm with you, Tommy. It's also easier to parse the XML source visually
with this form while editing, not that this is a major concern.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20050918/e58c28af/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list