Persistent overlay?

[cornel panceac]

while persistence is something i understand, i as a nonnativenglishspeaker,
don't really understand that overlay persistence. so yes, imho it should be
replaced.

2008/5/19 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org>:

> Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm not sure whether changing this midstream is a great idea.  After
>> all, the "persistence" and "persistent overlay" were terms I described
>> repeatedly and consistently with every one of the dozen or more
>> interviews I gave for Fedora 9.
>>
>
> I noticed and it I am still not sure it is the right choice. Many people
> didn't even get the idea on what was different from previous releases of
> Fedora or other distributions on this particular USB feature. I am still of
> the opinion "persistent overlay" is just not the right terminology for end
> users.
>
>
> Rahul
>
> --
> fedora-docs-list mailing list
> fedora-docs-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
>



-- 
Linux counter #213090
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20080519/52d28c1b/attachment.htm>