[[DocsProject/Licensing/FAQ]] still refers to the OPL

[Eric Christensen]

On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:19 -0600, Mel Chua wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/Licensing/FAQ still refers to 
> the old OPL license - I put a reminder on the talk page 
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Docs_Project_licensing_FAQ)  to 
> revise it and linked to the 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Relicensing_OPL_to_CC_BY_SA explanation page.
> 
> This is the main page on docs licensing that you find if you follow 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses. I'd go and make the 
> changes myself now if I weren't boarding a plane to Tokyo in a couple 
> minutes.
> 
> --Mel
> 

I think I posted something about this on the Talk page of the Legal page
but I can't change that.  I'll get to work on the DocsProject page.
There is a lot of information that will need to be changed there.

--Eric
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20091117/53f7d74f/attachment.sig>