[Fedora-electronic-lab-list] Re: verilator

[Lane Brooks]

Chitlesh,

I submitted the new package request bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516

I will need you to sponsor me.

Lane

Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Lane Brooks < email_hidden > wrote:
>> Attached is the spec file I put together for verilator.  You can download
>> the source rpm from http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator-3.680-1.fc10.src.rpm
> 
> Hello Lane,
> 
> You have done a great job packaging verilator without systemc for
> fedora. It is now for sure that fedora will now have systemc.[0]
> 
> However, your spec file is 70% complete :), the rest of the 30% is to
> make the spec file respect the very strict packaging guidelines [1] of
> Fedora. I will help you with that.
> 
> Please file a package review request [2] on bugzilla and register you
> as a Fedora packager [3], if you are not: I am a sponsor, so you don't
> to go and find another one.
> 
> Once you have filed a package review request for verilator, we can
> start with the official review and hopefully push verilator into
> fedora repositories very soon. Also paste the link of the RH Bugzilla
> on the Fedora Electronic Lab mailing list so that there will be more
> eyes to review verilator.
> 
> [0] http://clunixchit.blogspot.com/2008/07/fel-systemc-was-put-aside-legal.html
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=extras-review
> [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
> 
> Kind regards,
> Chitlesh GOORAH
> 
> PS: I am still without my own internet connection. Belgacom is taking
> to much time :(