D1x license
Michael Wiktowy
mwiktowy at gmx.net
Fri Apr 29 20:31:51 UTC 2005
Michael A. Peters wrote:
>On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 14:08 -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
>
>
>
>>There is a middle ground that would likely make everyone's life easier.
>>Ensuring clear and consistent marking of the license type in the rpm
>>package info would make non-commercial variants much easier to filter
>>out with a simple script.
>>
>>
>
>Or such packages could go in rpm.livna.org.
>Putting them in rpm.livna.org IMHO is a much better solution - because
>there can not be scenarios where packages that are otherwise free link
>against them, and thus are not distributable.
>
>
<strawman snipped>
I think you are talking apples and oranges here. In my mind, "some
restrictions on the distribution of packages" does not equal "totally
illegal to distribute in some countries with screwed up IP laws". AFAIK,
livna.org is intended for the latter and probably can't even by linked
to directly in the Fedora installer for fear of
contributory-yadda-yadda-yadda (sorry for the legal jargon ;]).
While I totally agree with you that allowing non-commercial restrictions
on packages in Extras adds complexity to the repackaging of Extras for
commercial purposes. I don't think that the aversion to that complexity
justifies the complete exclusion of those packages from Extras.
In any case, looking at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines , it would seem that
written permission to distribute the binary datafile *without
restriction* is needed from the author anyways. So to comply with that
condition either, D1x engine is put in Extras and links to code obtained
from non-Extras sources (with a stub package to link to if complete
dependency closure is required within Extras+Core ... I didn't find that
restriction anywhere) or permission is obtained from the author to
distribute the binary datafile without restriction (including
non-commercial restrictions I would assume). So unless there is
willingness to modify the guidelines, it appears black and white as it
stands.
/Mike
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list